Gyponini

Stål, 1870

Genus Guides

13

Gyponini is a tribe of leafhoppers (Cicadellidae) in the Iassinae, comprising approximately 60 and over 1,300 described . Formerly treated as a subfamily, it is now classified within Iassinae. The tribe is restricted to the Americas, with species distributed from North America through Central America to South America. Gyponini is taxonomically diverse and has been the subject of extensive revisionary work, including numerous new species descriptions and generic reclassifications.

Hamana manifesta by (c) Sam Kieschnick, some rights reserved (CC BY), uploaded by Sam Kieschnick. Used under a CC-BY license.Dragonana dracontea by (c) Sue Carnahan, some rights reserved (CC BY), uploaded by Sue Carnahan. Used under a CC-BY license.Dragonana dracontea by (c) Sue Carnahan, some rights reserved (CC BY), uploaded by Sue Carnahan. Used under a CC-BY license.

Pronunciation

How to pronounce Gyponini: /dʒɪˈpɒnɪnaɪ/

These audio files are automatically generated. While they are not always 100% accurate, they are a good starting point.

Images

Distribution

Restricted to the Americas; documented from the United States through Mexico, Central America, and throughout South America including Brazil, Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, Rica, Guatemala, French Guiana, and other Neotropical regions.

Ecological Role

for in the Dryinidae (Hymenoptera: Chrysidoidea), including Anteon and Gonatopus. Specific host records include Curtara concava, Gypona lita, and Reticana lineatta as hosts for dryinid parasitoids.

More Details

Taxonomic history

Gyponini was formerly treated as a (Gyponinae) but is now classified as a tribe within the subfamily Iassinae. The tribe has undergone extensive taxonomic revision, with numerous elevated from subgeneric status and multiple new combinations proposed for previously placed in different genera.

Research focus

Recent taxonomic studies on Gyponini have focused heavily on the Brazilian fauna, with multiple papers describing new in such as Polana, Costanana, Fuminana, and others. These studies typically include male genitalia descriptions, identification keys, and distribution records, but rarely provide ecological or biological data.

Tags

Sources and further reading