Odiellus nubivagus
Crosby & Bishop, 1924
Odiellus nubivagus is a of harvestman (order Opiliones) in the Phalangiidae, described by Crosby & Bishop in 1924. It belongs to the Oligolophinae, a group characterized by relatively short legs and compact body forms compared to other phalangiid harvestmen. The species is known from a modest number of observations, with 43 records documented on iNaturalist.
Pronunciation
How to pronounce Odiellus nubivagus: /oˈdiːɛləs nuˈbiːvaɡus/
These audio files are automatically generated. While they are not always 100% accurate, they are a good starting point.
Identification
Within the Odiellus, O. nubivagus can be distinguished by specific features of the male genitalia, particularly the structure of the glans and stylus, though detailed morphological descriptions require examination of . The shares the general Odiellus body plan of a rounded, somewhat flattened body with relatively short, robust legs compared to the long-legged harvestmen of genera such as Phalangium or Leiobunum. Accurate identification to species level generally requires microscopic examination and comparison with described specimens.
Distribution
The has been documented in North America; specific range details are limited in available sources. The 43 iNaturalist observations suggest it occurs in temperate regions of the United States, though precise locality data requires further verification.
Similar Taxa
- Odiellus pictusAnother North American in the same , sharing similar body proportions and preferences; distinguished by male genital and subtle differences in coloration pattern.
- Oligolophus tridensMember of the same Oligolophinae with comparable short-legged, compact ; differs in tarsal claw structure and ocular position.
More Details
Taxonomic History
Described by Crosby & Bishop in 1924, this has remained within the Odiellus throughout its taxonomic history. The genus Odiellus is part of the diverse harvestman fauna of North America, with most species requiring careful morphological study for accurate identification.
Data Limitations
Available sources provide minimal biological information for this . The 43 iNaturalist observations represent the most accessible occurrence data, but these lack systematic ecological documentation. Primary literature describing the species is not readily available in the consulted sources.