Xorides albopictus

(Cresson, 1870)

Xorides albopictus is a of ichneumon in the Ichneumonidae, first described by Cresson in 1870. It belongs to the Xorides, which comprises wasps that attack wood-boring beetles. The specific epithet 'albopictus' (Latin for 'white-painted') likely refers to distinctive pale markings on the body. As with other members of its genus, this species is presumed to be a parasitoid of cerambycid or buprestid larvae, though specific records for X. albopictus appear limited in published literature.

Xorides albopictus ♀ (48799239087) by Christina Butler from Georgia, United States. Used under a CC BY 2.0 license.

Pronunciation

How to pronounce Xorides albopictus: //ksɔˈɹaɪdiːz ˌælboʊˈpɪktəs//

These audio files are automatically generated. While they are not always 100% accurate, they are a good starting point.

Images

Distribution

Recorded from Vermont, United States. The appears to have a North American distribution, though precise range boundaries are not well documented. Distribution records are sparse, with observations documented through iNaturalist and GBIF.

Host Associations

  • Cerambycidae - presumed larval Based on -level ; specific records for X. albopictus not confirmed
  • Buprestidae - presumed larval Based on -level ; specific records for X. albopictus not confirmed

Ecological Role

As a member of the Xorides, this likely functions as a agent of wood-boring . Ichneumonid wasps in this genus are specialized that locate beetle larvae tunneling in wood and deposit on or near the .

More Details

Taxonomic note

The specific epithet 'albopictus' is shared with the Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus), but the two are unrelated. Xorides albopictus is a , while Aedes albopictus is a mosquito. The similar naming reflects independent descriptions using the same Latin descriptor for white markings.

Data limitations

Published biological information specific to Xorides albopictus is scarce. Most knowledge is inferred from -level studies of Xorides . The has been documented through citizen science platforms (iNaturalist: 70 observations) and biodiversity databases, but formal taxonomic revisions and records appear limited in accessible literature.

Tags

Sources and further reading