Trypophloeus nitidus

Swaine, J.M., 1912

Trypophloeus nitidus is a of bark beetle in the weevil Curculionidae, described by J.M. Swaine in 1912. The Trypophloeus comprises bark beetles that tunnel beneath bark of woody plants. As a member of this genus, T. nitidus is associated with coniferous . The species was synonymized under Phymatodes mojavensis by some authors, but Phymatodes mojavensis was subsequently synonymized under Phymatodes nitidus in a 2010 nomenclatural revision by Swift and Ray, which affects the broader taxonomic context of this species. The species is provisionally accepted in current taxonomic databases.

Trypophloeus nitidus, frontal view by Patrice Bouchard, Anthony E. Davies, Serge Laplante, Hume Douglas, Karine Savard, Adam Brunke, Joel Buffam, Mackenzie Gamman. Used under a CC0 license.

Pronunciation

How to pronounce Trypophloeus nitidus: /trɪˌpɒfˈliːəs ˈnɪtɪdəs/

These audio files are automatically generated. While they are not always 100% accurate, they are a good starting point.

Images

Habitat

Associated with coniferous forests and woodland , as typical for bark beetles in the Trypophloeus.

Host Associations

  • Pinus - Trypophloeus associated with Pinaceae; specific records for T. nitidus require verification

Ecological Role

As a bark beetle, contributes to nutrient cycling in forest through wood decomposition. May also function as a forest pest under certain conditions.

Similar Taxa

  • Phymatodes mojavensisPreviously considered a separate but synonymized under Phymatodes nitidus in Swift & Ray 2010; historical confusion in
  • Trypophloeus asperatusCongeneric bark beetle with similar in coniferous

More Details

Taxonomic note

Trypophloeus nitidus was originally described in 1912. The has undergone taxonomic revision, with some transferred to related genera. The 2010 nomenclatural changes in Phymatodes by Swift and Ray clarified that Phymatodes mojavensis is a synonym of Phymatodes nitidus, though this applies to a different genus (Phymatodes vs. Trypophloeus). The relationship between these generic classifications requires further clarification.

Tags

Sources and further reading