Clostera multnoma
(Dyar, 1892)
Clostera multnoma is a in the Notodontidae, first described by Harrison G. Dyar in 1892. The species has been recorded from several Canadian provinces including Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. Taxonomic status remains somewhat complex, with some sources treating it as a synonym of Clostera brucei while others maintain it as a valid species. Like other members of the Clostera, it belongs to the Pygaerinae within the prominent moth family.
Pronunciation
How to pronounce Clostera multnoma: //klɒˈstɪərə mʌltˈnoʊmə//
These audio files are automatically generated. While they are not always 100% accurate, they are a good starting point.
Identification
Members of the Clostera are generally small to medium-sized notodontid with relatively broad wings and muted coloration. Specific diagnostic features for C. multnoma distinguishing it from such as C. strigosa, C. albosigma, and C. brucei are not well documented in available literature. Accurate identification likely requires examination of genitalia or reference to original .
Distribution
Documented from western Canada: Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. Distribution records suggest a prairie and forest zone occurrence pattern typical for many North American Notodontidae.
Similar Taxa
- Clostera bruceiTaxonomic synonymy; some authorities treat C. multnoma as a synonym of C. brucei, while others maintain distinction. Morphological separation may be subtle or require genitalic examination.
- Clostera strigosaCongeneric with overlapping North American distribution; both occur in similar western and share general Clostera .
- Clostera albosigmaWidespread congeneric ; may overlap in range and requires careful examination to distinguish from C. multnoma.
More Details
Taxonomic Uncertainty
The taxonomic status of C. multnoma remains unresolved. GBIF lists it as a synonym of C. brucei, while Catalogue of Life treats it as accepted. This discrepancy reflects ongoing challenges in Notodontidae and the need for revisionary work.
Data Scarcity
Despite being described in 1892, C. multnoma remains poorly known with limited biological information available. The 25 iNaturalist observations suggest it is infrequently encountered or underreported.