Panscopus impressus

Pierce, 1913

broad-nosed weevil

Panscopus impressus is a of broad-nosed weevil in the Curculionidae. The species was described by Pierce in 1913. It is found in North America, with specific distribution records from Alabama (Anderson, Blount, Clarke, Clay) and North Carolina (Buncombe). As a member of the broad-nosed weevil group, it possesses the characteristic short, broad rostrum typical of this within Curculionidae.

Figures 13–18. Habitus images. 13 in Comparison of the Coleoptera communities in leaf litter and rotten wood in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA by Ferro, Michael L., Gimmel, Matthew L., Harms, Kyle E. & Carlton, Christopher E.. Used under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Pronunciation

How to pronounce Panscopus impressus: //pænˈskoʊ.pəs ɪmˈprɛs.əs//

These audio files are automatically generated. While they are not always 100% accurate, they are a good starting point.

Identification

Identified as a broad-nosed weevil by the abbreviated, broad rostrum. Specific identification to level requires examination of the impressed surface features referenced in the species epithet, likely involving detailed examination of elytral or pronotal sculpturing. Distinguishing from other Panscopus species would require comparison of and reference to Pierce's 1913 original description.

Images

Distribution

North America. Specific county-level records documented from Alabama (Anderson, Blount, Clarke, Clay counties) and North Carolina (Buncombe County).

Similar Taxa

Other Panscopus speciesSame , would share broad-nosed weevil ; distinguished by specific impressed markings and other subtle morphological differences
Other broad-nosed weevils (various genera in Curculionidae)Share short, broad rostrum; distinguished by -level characters including body shape, tarsal structure, and genitalia

More Details

Taxonomic history

Described by Pierce in 1913. The Panscopus is classified within the Curculionidae, though some sources place it in Brachyceridae (a family sometimes treated as distinct from or subsumed within Curculionidae depending on classification system used).

Specimen records

Distribution data is sparse, with only five counties documented in GBIF records. The is represented by 29 observations in iNaturalist, suggesting it may be undercollected or genuinely uncommon.