Glaphyrometopus ornithodorus

Pierce, 1913

Glaphyrometopus ornithodorus is a of broad-nosed weevil described by Pierce in 1913. It belongs to the tribe Naupactini within the Entiminae of the weevil Curculionidae. The species is documented from North America with specific records from Grimes. Like other members of its tribe, it possesses a broad rostrum and is likely associated with vegetation, though specific ecological details remain poorly documented.

Pronunciation

How to pronounce Glaphyrometopus ornithodorus: /ɡlæfɪroʊˈmɛtoʊpəs ɔrnɪˈθɒdərəs/

These audio files are automatically generated. While they are not always 100% accurate, they are a good starting point.

Identification

Members of Glaphyrometopus can be distinguished from related naupactine by features of the rostrum and antennal insertion. Specific diagnostic characters for G. ornithodorus are not readily available in accessible literature. The would key to the genus Glaphyrometopus based on the combination of broad rostral form and other tribal characters, but species-level identification likely requires examination of male genitalia or other subtle morphological features.

Distribution

Recorded from North America, specifically from Grimes (likely referring to Grimes County, Texas, USA based on specimen data patterns). The full extent of its range is unknown due to limited collection records.

Similar Taxa

  • Other Glaphyrometopus speciesCongeneric share the broad rostrum and general body form characteristic of the ; species boundaries within Glaphyrometopus are not well resolved in available literature.
  • Naupactini genera (e.g., Naupactus, Pantomorus)These share the broad-nosed weevil and tribe-level characteristics; Glaphyrometopus is distinguished by specific rostral proportions and antennal club structure.

More Details

Taxonomic note

The Glaphyrometopus is part of the diverse tribe Naupactini, which contains numerous genera of broad-nosed weevils primarily distributed in the Americas. The group is taxonomically challenging with many described from limited material.

Data limitations

This is known from very few specimens (14 iNaturalist observations, limited museum records). Most aspects of its remain undocumented.

Sources and further reading