Charidotella ormondensis
(Blatchley, 1920)
Charidotella ormondensis is a tortoise beetle (Cassidinae) described by Blatchley in 1920. The is known from the southeastern United States, with the type locality near Ormond Beach, Florida. Like other members of Charidotella, it likely feeds on bindweeds and morning glories (Convolvulaceae), though specific records for this species are limited. It remains poorly documented in the scientific literature.
Pronunciation
How to pronounce Charidotella ormondensis: //ˌkæɹɪˈdoʊtə.lə ˌɔrˌmɒnˈdɛn.sɪs//
These audio files are automatically generated. While they are not always 100% accurate, they are a good starting point.
Identification
Charidotella ormondensis is distinguished from other Charidotella primarily by geographic distribution and subtle structural features of the and pronotum. It most closely resembles C. sexpunctata, but differs in the arrangement and shape of the dark markings on the elytra. Examination of the is required for definitive identification. The species name refers to Ormond Beach, Florida, the type locality.
Habitat
Coastal and near-coastal environments in the southeastern United States, likely associated with sandy soils where plants in Convolvulaceae occur.
Distribution
Known from Florida and potentially adjacent southeastern states. Type locality: Ormond Beach, Volusia County, Florida. Distribution records in GBIF indicate presence in North America, with specific occurrences in the southeastern coastal plain.
Similar Taxa
- Charidotella sexpunctataOverlaps in range and general appearance; distinguished by elytral pattern and male genitalia.
- Charidotella bicolorSimilar body form and size; differs in coloration and geographic distribution.
More Details
Taxonomic history
Originally described as Cassida ormondensis by Blatchley (1920) based on specimens from Ormond Beach, Florida. Later transferred to Charidotella. The has received little subsequent taxonomic attention.
Documentation status
Extremely poorly documented: iNaturalist reports only 1 research-grade observation, and the is rarely cited in ecological or agricultural literature. This likely reflects genuine rarity, restricted , or undercollection rather than taxonomic invalidity.