Chrysobothris bispinosa

Schaeffer, 1909

Chrysobothris bispinosa is a of metallic wood-boring beetle in the Buprestidae, first described by Schaeffer in 1909. It belongs to the large Chrysobothris, which contains numerous species that are often difficult to distinguish from one another. The species is known from both Central America and North America. Like other members of its genus, it is presumed to develop in dead or dying wood, though specific details about its remain poorly documented.

Chrysobothris bispinosa by (c) Andrew Meeds, some rights reserved (CC BY), uploaded by Andrew Meeds. Used under a CC-BY license.

Pronunciation

How to pronounce Chrysobothris bispinosa: /ˌkrɪsoʊˈbɒθrɪs baɪˌspaɪˈnoʊsə/

These audio files are automatically generated. While they are not always 100% accurate, they are a good starting point.

Identification

Specific diagnostic characters for distinguishing C. bispinosa from other Chrysobothris are not documented in the available sources. The Chrysobothris as a whole is taxonomically challenging, with species often requiring examination of subtle morphological features such as elytral , antennal structure, and pygidial form for accurate identification.

Images

Distribution

Recorded from Central America and North America. Distribution records indicate presence in both Middle America and North America, though specific countries or regions within these broad areas are not detailed in available sources.

Similar Taxa

Chrysobothris femorata species-groupMembers of this -group are among the most commonly encountered and taxonomically challenging Chrysobothris in North America, and C. bispinosa may be confused with them without careful examination. The C. femorata group was revised by Wellso and Manley (2007), but C. bispinosa is not included in that revision.

More Details

Taxonomic context

Chrysobothris bispinosa was described by Schaeffer in 1909, making it one of the earlier described in this large . The genus Chrysobothris currently contains over 100 described species in North America alone, many of which remain poorly known biologically.

Data limitations

This is represented by only 2 observations on iNaturalist as of the data retrieval date, suggesting it is rarely encountered or underreported. No plant records, detailed distribution data, or biological studies were found in the available sources.