Brachymyrmex patagonicus

Mayr, 1868

Dark Rover Ant, Black Rover Ant

Brachymyrmex patagonicus is a small native to South America that has established across the southern United States, Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean. are diminutive (1.0–2.0 mm), brown to black, with nine-segmented and relatively large compared to . The exhibits an unusual multicolonial social structure for an invasive ant, with most colonies consisting of a single nest headed by one , maintaining aggression toward non-nestmates rather than forming supercolonies. It is a significant nuisance pest of buildings but does not bite, sting, or .

Brachymyrmex patagonicus by (c) Sam Kieschnick, some rights reserved (CC BY), uploaded by Sam Kieschnick. Used under a CC-BY license.Brachymyrmex patagonicus casent0173480 label 1 by Michele Esposito. Used under a CC BY 4.0 license.Brachymyrmex patagonicus casent0173480 profile 1 by April Nobile. Used under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Pronunciation

How to pronounce Brachymyrmex patagonicus: /bræˌkɪmɪrˈmɛks ˌpætəˈgɒnɪkəs/

These audio files are automatically generated. While they are not always 100% accurate, they are a good starting point.

Identification

Distinguished from other Brachymyrmex by the combination of: nine-segmented (shared with all ), long hairs on the mesosoma, relatively large , and sparse appressed hairs on the surface. Previously confused with B. musculus and B. obscurior, which are now synonymized. In the field, small size and dark coloration separate it from larger formicine ants; the lack of a sting and non-aggressive distinguish it from Solenopsis fire ants with which it co-occurs.

Images

Habitat

In its native range, occupies naturally disturbed . In the introduced range, primarily associated with human-modified environments: buildings (indoor pest), landscaped areas with mulch, bases of trees, leaf litter, wood piles, and trash accumulations. Laboratory studies indicate preference for moist environments. Outdoor established in subtropical and temperate regions; indoor occurrences reported in colder climates where outdoor survival is uncertain.

Distribution

Native: South America (Argentina, Paraguay, and broader distribution including Mexico and Central America). Introduced range: United States (15 states from North Carolina to California, first detected Louisiana 1976), Bahamas, continental Asia, Spain, Martinique. Indoor occurrences: England, Netherlands, Japan. Rapid spread documented: from 7 states in 2007 to 15 states in less than a decade.

Diet

Has been observed visiting extrafloral for nectar. Honeydew from hemipterans is hypothesized to constitute a major dietary component. In laboratory settings, survives on artificial diet containing 30% honey solution, liquid tuna mixture, and caterpillar pieces. Preys on small soft-bodied insects including aphids; photographic documentation shows subduing crapemyrtle aphids (Sarucallis kahawaluokalani).

Life Cycle

Colonies produce (winged reproductive queens and males) that disperse through rather than colony . New colonies founded independently by single queens. No specific seasonal data on nuptial flight timing available in sources.

Behavior

Multicolonial structure: each colony occupies a single nest with maintained aggression toward non-nestmates, contrasting with supercolonial ants. Nestmate recognition mediated by chemical differentiation between colonies; aggression levels correlate with genetic divergence. Aggressive include biting and formic acid spraying, escalating to fighting. display mutual between some nests in close proximity (few centimeters). Foraging trails established on exterior walls and surfaces up to 3–4 m from structures. Does not bite or sting humans.

Ecological Role

pest achieving high densities in urban environments through multicolonial expansion rather than supercolonial resource monopolization. Coexists with native and introduced species including Solenopsis invicta and S. xyloni, species typically intolerant of competitors. Hypothesized role in regulating populations of invasive cactus moth (Cactoblastis cactorum), currently under investigation. Functions as of small soft-bodied insects and consumer of liquid in urban .

Human Relevance

Significant nuisance pest infesting man-made structures, particularly in the southern United States. Attracted to moisture and food sources in kitchens and bathrooms. Does not bite, sting, or mechanically transmit , resulting in lower priority for management compared to more harmful ants. Rapid spread and establishment in new regions facilitated by human commerce and movement of goods.

Similar Taxa

  • Brachymyrmex obscuriorFormerly considered a separate but synonymized with B. patagonicus based on morphological comparison of specimens from the Louisiana State University Collection; historically misidentified as distinct.
  • Brachymyrmex musculusFormerly considered a separate but synonymized with B. patagonicus; part of the same taxonomic confusion resolved through specimen comparison.
  • Solenopsis invicta (Red Imported Fire Ant)Co-occurs in the range and similarly small, but distinguished by presence of sting, aggressive , and two-segmented petiole node; B. patagonicus lacks sting and has one-segmented petiole.

Misconceptions

Long misidentified as multiple (B. patagonicus, B. musculus, B. obscurior) due to insufficient morphological study; resolved through systematic comparison of museum specimens. The species' success as an despite lacking the supercolonial structure typical of other invasive ants challenges assumptions about necessary traits for invasion success.

More Details

Colony Genetic Structure

Genetic analysis of 50 nests across four Texas localities using 10 microsatellite markers confirmed: most colonies monogyne (single , ~80%), with ~20% queenless; of monogyne colonies, ~50% had queens mated with single male; no isolation by distance detected, indicating strong ability through rather than .

Aggression and Nestmate Recognition

In , colonies achieve of one nest every ~2.5 meters while maintaining intercolonial aggression. Chemical profiles differ between colonies, but aggression levels correlate with rather than overall chemical differentiation, suggesting specific compounds mediate recognition.

Taxonomic History

First reported in the United States in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana in 1978 from a colony collected in 1976; believed introduced through New Orleans or alternatively Mobile, Alabama, or Pensacola, Florida. Three recognized: B. p. atratulus, B. p. cordemoyi, B. p. patagonicus.

Tags

Sources and further reading